🔗 Share this article

Among some of the most famous images of the 20th century portrays a naked young girl, her limbs spread wide, her expression twisted in agony, her skin burned and raw. She is fleeing in the direction of the lens as escaping a napalm attack during the conflict. Beside her, additional kids are racing out of the devastated hamlet in Trảng Bàng, amid a backdrop featuring black clouds along with troops.

This Worldwide Effect of a Single Photograph

Within hours its release in the early 1970s, this picture—formally called The Terror of War—became an analog sensation. Viewed and analyzed globally, it has been widely credited for motivating public opinion critical of the US war in Vietnam. One noted critic subsequently remarked how this profoundly indelible image featuring the child Kim Phúc suffering probably had a greater impact to fuel global outrage against the war compared to extensive footage of broadcast barbarities. A renowned British photojournalist who reported on the war called it the most powerful image from what became known as the televised conflict. Another experienced combat photographer remarked how the picture represents in short, among the most significant photographs in history, particularly of the Vietnam war.

The Long-Held Credit and a Modern Claim

For 53 years, the photograph was credited to Nick Út, an emerging South Vietnamese photojournalist employed by the Associated Press in Saigon. But a provocative recent documentary streaming on a streaming service argues which states the well-known picture—long considered as the pinnacle of combat photography—may have been taken by another person on the scene during the attack.

As claimed by the investigation, "Napalm Girl" was in fact captured by a freelancer, who provided his photos to the news agency. The assertion, along with the documentary's following inquiry, stems from an individual called a former photo editor, who states how the dominant photo chief instructed the staff to reassign the photo's byline from the stringer to the staff photographer, the only AP staff photographer there that day.

This Quest to find Answers

The source, currently elderly, emailed an investigator in 2022, asking for assistance to identify the uncredited photographer. He expressed how, if he could be found, he wished to extend a regret. The filmmaker thought of the independent photojournalists he worked with—likening them to the stringers of today, just as independent journalists in that era, are frequently overlooked. Their efforts is often doubted, and they operate in far tougher circumstances. They have no safety net, no retirement plans, they don’t have support, they often don’t have proper gear, and they are extremely at risk when documenting in their own communities.

The journalist asked: How would it feel for the man who captured this iconic picture, if indeed Nick Út didn’t take it?” As a photographer, he thought, it must be profoundly difficult. As a student of the craft, specifically the highly regarded combat images from that war, it would be reputation-threatening, perhaps reputation-threatening. The hallowed history of the image in Vietnamese-Americans meant that the director who had family left at the time was hesitant to take on the project. He expressed, “I didn’t want to disrupt this long-held narrative that Nick had taken the photograph. Nor did I wish to change the status quo among a group that had long admired this accomplishment.”

The Inquiry Unfolds

However the two the investigator and his collaborator agreed: it was necessary posing the inquiry. “If journalists must hold everybody else in the world,” said one, “we have to can address tough issues about our own field.”

The film documents the journalists while conducting their inquiry, from eyewitness interviews, to call-outs in modern Ho Chi Minh City, to archival research from additional films taken that day. Their efforts eventually yield a candidate: Nguyễn Thành Nghệ, working for a television outlet at the time who also sold photographs to foreign agencies independently. In the film, a heartfelt Nghệ, now also in his 80s residing in California, attests that he sold the image to the agency for minimal payment and a copy, only to be troubled without recognition for decades.

This Reaction Followed by Additional Analysis

He is portrayed in the footage, reserved and calm, however, his claim became explosive within the community of war photography. {Days before|Shortly prior to